Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Anybody else seein' floaters out there?


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Anybody else seein' floaters out there?
Permalink  
 


Ya just gotta  be careful with those fish, people! Damn...............there are so many fish floating! 

What do you think when you see a floating 27 inch walleye?

This is what I think: " Why didn't you revive that thing before you threw it in the water""

Do you know how many walleyes die from carelessness and ignorance?

Let's figure it out...........

 

86 miles of shoreline

I found 27  walleyes dead in 200 yards

If that's true for even a PART of the lake, that's  20433 fish ALREADY ON SHORE!(thanks, fife.)

At an average of 4 pounds, that's 81734 pounds of stinking, rotting fish that COULD BE IN OUR FREEZERS!!!!!!!!!!!, but they're rotting on our beaches.

 

SLOTS DON"T WORK.

http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/fish/walleye/catch_release.html

 

It' reality guys. This is getting dumber as we go.............confuse

 



 



-- Edited by tat2jonnie on Friday 20th of July 2012 02:50:39 AM



-- Edited by tat2jonnie on Friday 20th of July 2012 10:23:56 AM

Attachments
__________________

Cass_200.gif



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Date:
Permalink  
 

I like the 60" rule, lake health would benefit, if, people didnt abuse it. If a 60" rule were in place, it really only affects the people looking to take fish home- the people fishing just for the big ones/releasing, will still do it.. Even the people looking to keep fish, could easily go out & 'pound em'/release, before deciding to keep any...

Has the input group/DNR discussed this at all?



-- Edited by wallyhntr1 on Friday 20th of July 2012 12:50:28 PM

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 167
Date:
Permalink  
 

Drives me crazy

__________________

JW



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:
Permalink  
 

We did see quite a few out there during the Couples Tourney ( not from the tourney, too old), but still makes you sick!  no

We caught 15 fish between 21 and 27.75" and didn't take a picture of one of them.  It was just too hot.  Got them all back in the water ASAP.

 



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Date:
Permalink  
 

This will piss people off, & I do understand why, but- With the lake being in the state it's in, it sure doesnt help to have people promoting the hell out of catching tons & tons of big fish, most every report on the internet now is of big fish & a lot of them, many of these reports are coming from people making a living from that lake...

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm not completely getting your point.  Tell me how to keep the big ones off the hook and put some in the box, and I will do it!

I don't think talking about or promoting catching big fish is the problem.  Need to look @ the slot and the netting.



__________________


Formica Flat Vet

Status: Offline
Posts: 471
Date:
Permalink  
 

86 miles X 5280 ft./mile = 454080 feet of shoreline

454080/3 = 151360 yards

151360/200 = 756.80

756.80 X 27 = 20433

My calculations give me 20,433 fish.

At 4 pounds per fish I get 81,732 lbs.

 

Its still a good reminder that we need to get the fish back in the water as soon as possible.  Personally, I use mostly artificials this time of year so I never have a gut hooked fish.  Last weekend all of the fish swam away and the 6 we kept were all alive in the livewell at the end of the day.



__________________

Humana Insurance Representative-Brainerd and Mille Lacs Area

 




Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

The SIXTY inch rule is awesome and sensible Jon. I am voting for you (and Bobber) for Governor  and Governor's video man. Take your pick please.

That makes good sense. Malmo Mike says so. smilesmilesmile

 Why can't we just have a sensible rule from the DNR?

Fife even did the math for them.



-- Edited by MCallies on Friday 20th of July 2012 02:55:20 PM

__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Date:
Permalink  
 

Read the different fishing sites, LSF for example- Mille Lacs is being promoted to the hilt & that's my point- it's people screaming to get there 'because' of the big fish... Internet is a powerful tool & it seems a lot of people do not care about catching keeper fish, they want the big fish & are flocking to the lake. Many of the people taking pictures/posting reports are people making a living from the lake, totally understand why the promotion is heavy..

Yes, the slot does need to be looked at & netting must be banned...

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

Some may have missed the point, here, but you bring up a valid point about promoting fishing for big ones.

Used to be back in time a long, long while ago before slots, people used to fish for big ones to bring home to their families.

All's I'm saying is, that 81,743 lbs (or whatever it actually is) would work better for us if they were in our freezers instead of littering our beaches. We are being charged on the mortallity count, yet it ain't feeding anyone.

I think that most of us that work on the lake know how to successfully release fish and we have a responsibility to teach the customers we have out fishing to do the same. Those reading the internet forums need to learn how to release fish unharmed.

That's kinda why I posted this. We need to come up with a limit that maximizes the amount these guys (and gals) bring home to eat and minimizes the wonton waste in the lake and on the stinking beaches.

I think the "60 inch rule" is the answer. You can take 60 inches of fish a day. That would be 4 -15", 3 -20" or whatever adds up to 60 inches. I caught 27 fish last night, with only one under 17". The limit would be reached before ANY had to be released.

There would literally be NO mortallity, cuz you wouldn't have to throw that 22" back (or that 24").



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Website Admin

Status: Offline
Posts: 1693
Date:
Permalink  
 

I like the 60" idea Jon. Every fish gets rounded up to the nearest inch,wink and there you have it.



__________________

Website Admin

 



Formica Flat Vet

Status: Offline
Posts: 471
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree, the 60" rule sounds intriguing.  Would someone be required to stop fishing once their limit has been met?



__________________

Humana Insurance Representative-Brainerd and Mille Lacs Area

 




Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 37
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know most of you guys are walleye fisherman,but lets take a poontoon troller surface temps. above 80 degrees,troll at 5 mph. hook the fish don't wanna stop because of your other lines that are out,pull the fish in mouth open at 5 mph. plowing the guts,bags,what ever you can imagine'take photos,measure,then throw over side at 5mph.Did that fish live?That pisses me off.



__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:
Permalink  
 

I proposed this to the DNR many years ago, and they said it was to complicated for fisherman to add numbers up. Go figure. 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 340
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oh YEAH!

Much easier to make a ban on catching males like they suggested. I'm sure it's real easy for fishermen that don't even know how to hold a spinning reel to identify the males...............evileye

I want to know who's the one that told you that retarded statement.



__________________

 

save_mille_lacs_850.jpg



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Date:
Permalink  
 

The combination of heat/warm water and the majority of people pulling fish out of deep water is going to kill alot of fish.

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 31
Date:
Permalink  
 

I like the 60" rule as well or something in that range. We were out Saturday morning and caught a nice batch of fish, 1 under 17, the rest in the 20-24 range with 1 26. All were released and swam away after carefully getting them back in the water, we would have been done in an hour if we wanted to be under this proposed rule. I agree Fife this time of year using the artificals sure seems to help not gutting them. That said, it makes too much sense and fisherman are for it so it will go nowhere which is really sad.

__________________


Admin / Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1254
Date:
Permalink  
 

I fished Winni this past weekend...saw lots of floaters up there also! The warm water is getting to some of the fish...

 

 



__________________

 


Bob (Bobber) Carlson

 

 

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Date:
Permalink  
 

One thing to keep in mind is that it takes a fish like a walleye a long time to adjust the gasses in the swim bladder.  A fish like a lake trout can "burp" the excess gas out when you pull it out of deep water whereas a walleye cannot.  So they get distended bladders and become floaters or Muskie food.



-- Edited by Sutty on Tuesday 24th of July 2012 09:32:08 AM

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 340
Date:
Permalink  
 

With the water temps consistantly in the 80s, the Tullibe are dying like flies and floating in as well. Get the beach rake out.



__________________

 

save_mille_lacs_850.jpg



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 182
Date:
Permalink  
 

Bobber wrote:

I fished Winni this past weekend...saw lots of floaters up there also! The warm water is getting to some of the fish...

 

 


 I was at Whinnie also and agree with Bobber.  80 degree water is a factor for the majority of the DOA's....  How many times have you caught a fish with an old hook stuck in its mouth at Mille Lacs...  They are hearty if you handle them properly...



__________________


Gray Goose Captain

Status: Offline
Posts: 676
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hence the 60" rule... a guy looking for 4 under 17 would spend all day trying to get his meal. With the 60" rule, he can be done in an hour, stopping from having to haul overs in all day & have his limit and actually eat the "would be floaters"

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:
Permalink  
 

Sounds simple enough Glen.  Let's see........  makes sense, what the people want, can only help the lake.   Too much common sense and not "their idea", so good luck getting it through.



__________________


Formica Flat Vet

Status: Offline
Posts: 471
Date:
Permalink  
 

Glen Ertl wrote:

Hence the 60" rule... a guy looking for 4 under 17 would spend all day trying to get his meal. With the 60" rule, he can be done in an hour, stopping from having to haul overs in all day & have his limit and actually eat the "would be floaters"


 Many of the anglers on Mille Lacs are happy catching fish and not necessarily keeping every fish that they catch.  The 60" rule will increase harvest, but have very little effect on the fishing pressure.

There are not anymore "floaters" this year than there have been in years past.  The numbers spike every summer about this time. 



__________________

Humana Insurance Representative-Brainerd and Mille Lacs Area

 




Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:
Permalink  
 

Good point Fife.



__________________


Gray Goose Captain

Status: Offline
Posts: 676
Date:
Permalink  
 

Fife, while I agree with some ofyour post, ALOT of people who "only CPR" keep plenty of fish too. lets not kid ourselves. For every guy who you see complaining about "not getting a meal" can now get his meal, instead of having to fish ALL DAY trying and making more flaoters. He can keep his 3 19" fish and be happy. No matter what you call it, harvest, floaters, dead bottom fish, they are removed from the available resource. If you allow fisherman to do the right thing, most will.... in other words, if a fish is not gonna make it, in fact you are having to see it float nearby for a coupe hours, scoop it up and enjoy it, rather than let it float to shore and rot for the birds.... ( I am one of those guys who will not fish for the sake of fishing, but I have intentions of getting a good meal when I can )

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'll 2nd that, Glen...

I'm one of those who 'in the past' would spend the couple hundred/drive 4hrs with the intentions of bringing fish home for dinner- those days are over with the current regulations/lake health & I would bet there are a lot of people in the same boat...

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 31
Date:
Permalink  
 

From my experience with my friends who fish, we all like to catch fish, who doesnt, but in the end we are out there to put a meal on the table. I have enjoyed catching a nice number of fish this summer, havent had much luck (or talent, you be the judge) in putting many in the freezer. It hasnt deterred me from going back out becuse you never when when that keeper might bite, but there needs to be a fundamental change in how this lake is being managed in my opinion.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 340
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well, we'll find out the lake's fate after tomorrow's DNR meeting with the tribe's GLIFWC who are responsible for setting quotas. ( 3.3 million anglers that fish Mille Lacs and 35,000 tribal members in the 8 bands that net.)

 Then we'll have to wait to hear the closed door meeting's results. ( It's a secret!)whisper.gif



__________________

 

save_mille_lacs_850.jpg



Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tomorrow is a big day alright for Mille Lacs lake!! I hope the Governor is listening to our calls. confusehmm



__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know more people who fish for sport than meat. But its no that far one way to the other.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard