Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Raising the slot?


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Raising the slot?
Permalink  
 


Are there still plans to raise the slot limit? Duh ... that has to have State approval and they are "out to lunch". Really hurts the public and business owners. If the DNR can't enforce the fishing license law how can they enforce the slot limit?

Government shut down ?? HOLD my tax payments.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah. I'm with you on that one. The biggest slot we got is in their @$$.lonely.gif



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Admin / Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1254
Date:
Permalink  
 

withapee wrote:

Are there still plans to raise the slot limit? Duh ... that has to have State approval and they are "out to lunch". Really hurts the public and business owners. If the DNR can't enforce the fishing license law how can they enforce the slot limit?

Government shut down ?? HOLD my tax payments.


 

Well said! moving the slot to 20 inches would have been big for everyone.....from guide customers, resorts, fisherman in general! everyone....

 

get going and do your jobs! anyone up for reelection this coming fall!



__________________

 


Bob (Bobber) Carlson

 

 

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:
Permalink  
 

Paper said yesterday that Friday was supposed to be the day, but that will most likely be delayed or not happen @ all.  no



__________________


Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

They suck! The Minnesota legislature is now a national disgrace.

They are going to continue to loose millions of dollars in business to other states as long as this State shutdown continues. It will not be easy to regain that business once it is lost. Dumb move number 1.

As we have heard -- soon the Beer removal will occur for many Miller and Coors products. Dumb move number 2.

A state without beer totally sucks!

There is no cure for STUPID.

Dumb and Dumber run ther State of Minnesota government.

 



__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 19
Date:
Permalink  
 

Don't forget the governer in that statement! He is out wandering the state instead of trying to hash this out.



__________________
n/a


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Date:
Permalink  
 

Well it looks like Dayton caved in. Too bad for the state but great news for the fishermen. Hopefully the slot will open soon.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't know that he caved in, exactly. I heard some Republicans caught him hanging around in the airport bathroom and grabbin' their ankles and stuff. Said something about a wide stance on the budget.



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink  
 

I don't think Amy Koch has seen her ankles in some time. "Wide" stance is more like it. I'm sure the "give and take" to settle the budget will not benefit us at all. How does one claim his/her loss to the State? No one wins when the State shuts down. Instead of giving hand outs they should pay for their damages.

__________________


Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

Right on withapee....

Amy Coch is is registered red-haired big ass b*tch.

Let's hope the economic damage can be kept to aminimum.



__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Gray Goose Captain

Status: Offline
Posts: 676
Date:
Permalink  
 

no matter what happened.. I am sure we all got shafted somehow...again....

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:
Permalink  
 

Why is Dayton "caving in" too bad for the state?  Were you in favor of spending more than we had?  I don't know about anyone else, but if I have $100 in my checking account, I don't try to spend $250.



__________________


Formica Flat Vet

Status: Offline
Posts: 471
Date:
Permalink  
 

Muskymadness wrote:

Why is Dayton "caving in" too bad for the state?  Were you in favor of spending more than we had?  I don't know about anyone else, but if I have $100 in my checking account, I don't try to spend $250.


 Its unfortunate because the budget is only a solution for this year and will just make next year's budget that much worse.  I wish they would have got together and "compromised" on a better long term solution, but atleast the shutdown is over.



__________________

Humana Insurance Representative-Brainerd and Mille Lacs Area

 




Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 130
Date:
Permalink  
 

This whole thing ticks me off bad- What a good plan they decided ondisbelief- Lets kick the can down the road for a couple more years and then lets deal with it. Both sides blow in my mind. I emailed them all this morning once again! I actually even got some responses already. My main gripe in the email- RACINO!!! Why not? They settle for borrowing the money for now- WHY not bring on the Racino??? What a perfect time for it. This would be money here to stay- not one time money. People will gamble- give them a choice on where to go! OR have the fine tribal industry give back to the state!

Ya- I'm not happy about or finest down in St. Paul right now

 


__________________

Cass_200.gif

RussDaBuss



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

Drop the soap again, guys.

Now the DNR (Stands for Definately Needs Restructuring) says that since the state was shut down at the time the slot was supposed to change from 18" to 20" they can't change it at all!

Here's a quote from the F@*kwads:

Posted at 3:20 PM on July 14, 2011 by Paul Tosto (0 Comments)

Whether or not Republicans and Gov. Mark Dayton reach accord today on a budget, the two-week state government shutdown means that Mille Lacs walleye limits will stay unchanged.

Here's the DNR release:

The Department of Natural Resources will not change the Lake Mille Lacs walleye slot limit this summer.

 

The current rule, requiring anglers to immediately release walleye from 18 inches through 28 inches, remains in effect. The possession limit is four, with one walleye larger than 28 inches allowed.

DNR biologists typically review angler harvest using creel surveys in May and June to determine whether the walleye length limit can be liberalized in mid-July.

Due to the state government shutdown that began July 1, DNR staff were unable to analyze creel data and estimate total winter and open-water harvest through June 30, as required by rule for the regulation to change.

DNR officials said there is also no way to post regulation changes on the DNR's website five days prior to the change becoming effective, as the rule requires.

All other fishing regulations remain in effect for Lake Mille Lacs.



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 459
Date:
Permalink  
 

What a complete Joke!!!!  Not surprising, but ridicilous!



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Date:
Permalink  
 

Our good ol Aitkin DNR rat bastards doing what they do best- regulating nonnatives for native benefit.

What do you suppose would have happened had this shutdown occured during netting season?

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Date:
Permalink  
 

 

This is what I got from Representative Denny McNamara: 

Petes, I did just talk to DNR, they are evaluating it and should know within week or 2 what changes will be made. Thx Denny

 

 

 



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink  
 

Does anyone know the volume of fish taken during the netting season this spring? I'm sure the DNR doesn't know. Now they don't have creel data and other harvest numbers. It sounds to me that the DNR has lost total control of Lake Mille Lacs. There are alot of large walleyes that will be hunting for a shortage of food. Good management DNR.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ha!

Here's a quote from the D(umb).N(o sense).R(etards).:

DNR biologists typically review angler harvest using creel surveys in May and June to determine whether the walleye length limit can be liberalized in mid-July.

Well, folks, I am here to tell you that the only thing that has been determined here by these so called "biologists" is that D is a passing grade!

The creel checkers (who we all know ain't got a clue) gave them their numbers in May and June (which was before the idiots went on vacation) So one and one make two, etc. What's so hard to figure?

DO YOUR JOB @$$#0[E$ !!!! 

evileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileyeevileye



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

VERY WELL STATED, Jon.

1. Rule 1: DNR Management or 'the Dumb and Dumber System'

2. Rule 2: There is no cure for: Dumb and Dumber (DNR=Does Not use Reason)

3. Rule 3: Common Sense: The good fisherman who respect the lake will find a way to catch a legal fish.

4. Rule 4: Always remember Rule #2.



__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Date:
Permalink  
 

its now on the dnr website they are raising it july 27th at 12:01 am  



__________________


Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thanks Mike....July 27th will have to work...smilebiggrin



__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

From Malmo Mike and Per the DNR Posting Jul 22, 2011: biggrinsmilebiggrinwink

Mille Lacs Lake Walleye Slot Limit Change

Date Posted: July 22, 2011

As required by the Expedited Emergency rule published in the State Register on April 25, 2011 (Volume 35, pages 1650-1652; Part 6264.0400, Subp. 4a, Item B), the walleye size limit on Mille Lacs Lake and associated tributaries will change as specified below because the walleye kill estimates were below the established quota of 238,500 pounds prior to July l.

As of 12:01 am July 27, the walleye regulations for Mille Lacs Lake and associated tributaries will be as follows:

While a person is on or fishing in Mille Lacs Lake and its associated tributaries to the posted boundaries, all walleye in possession must be greater than 28 inches in length or less than 20 inches in length. All walleye that are 20 to 28 inches in length must be immediately returned to the water. A person may take and possess not more than one walleye over 28 inches. The bag limit for walleye is four fish.

This regulation continues until midnight November 30, 2011. All fishing regulations for species other than walleye and all other fishing restrictions remain unchanged on Mille Lacs.

Go here for DNR site :

http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/fishing/millelacs.html





__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yipee!

Last night I had 4 I coulda kept.

That's good news, Mike.



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

It is great news, Jon! smilesmilesmilewink

I will be there at Mille lacs  in just 11 days or so -- I am counting on the better slot size to help us get some nice keepers. Good luck until I get there my friend!

have fun...keep me posted!

 



__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

This time you got some cold ones coming from me.......clap.gifbeer.gif



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 45
Date:
Permalink  
 

The slot goes to 20" at midnight 7/27.



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink  
 

I just hope the Resort Owners and guides can re-coup this year. Maybe they should raise the limit during ice fishing? I think we should at least ask for that due to the days we missed out on keeping the 18-1/4" fish. They usually raise the limit around the 15th (like last year) but it's still a reason to let them know we are not happy with the management of their department. The State and the DNR know what kind of revenues are at stake.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard